Mancini, S., Molinaro, N., Rizzi, L. and Carreiras, M. (2011). A person is not a number: participation in the speech in the calculation of the subject-verb agreement. Brain Res. 1410, 64-76. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.055 Bobaljik, J., and Wurmbrand, p. (2005). The area of agreement. Nat. Long. Linguist.
Theory 23, 809-865. doi: 10.1007/s1049-004-3792-4 Mancini, S., Molinaro, N., Davidson, D., Avilés, A., and Carreiras, M. (2014a). Person and syntax speech interface: an eye-tracking study of the chord. I`m J. J. Long. 76, 141-157.
doi: 10.1016/j.j.jml.2014.06.010 Languages cannot have a conventional agreement, as in Japanese or Malay; barely one, as in English; a small amount, as in spoken French; a moderate amount, such as in Greek or Latin; or a large quantity, as in Swahili. The verbs have 6 different forms in the contemporary form, for three people in the singular and plural. As in Latin, the subject is often abandoned. In Hungarian, verbs have a polypersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (accusative). There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all. (Adverbs have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I love someone or something indeterminate), szeretem (I love him, she, or her, or her, specifically), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, me, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, her or her especially). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is agreement between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often refers more or less precisely to the person).
Also keep in mind the agreement that has been shown to be also in the subjunctive mind. a fictitious contract that was created by a court to which a person is legally bound, as if there were a real contract of verbs in person and in number, and sometimes in sex, with their subjects. Articles and adjectives must correspond, in the case, the number and gender, to the underlyings they change. Mancini, S., Quiones, I., Molinari, N., Hernandez-Cabrera, J., and Carreiras, M. (2017). Detangling meaning in the brain: left-wing involvement in contract treatment. Cortex 86, 140-155. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.11.008 Here he is in agreement with Caesar, not with the enemies: it is the singular and not the plural (which is him). Here, too, there is another type of consensus: he tells us that Caesar was a man, not a woman – a female subject like Cleopatra would naturally resemble him, and a non-living subject as the state would need it.
This „gender“ agreement is only necessary if the agreed nostun is singular and not the spokesperson or recipient. Elsewhere, it is lost — there is no sexist information in mine, ours, yours or yours. In nomine sentences, the adjectives do not show a match with the noun, although pronouns do. z.B. a szép k-nyveitekkel „with your beautiful books“ („szép“: nice): the suffixes of the plural, the possessive „your“ and the fall marking „with“ are marked only on the name. Branigan, P. H., and MacKenzie, M. (2002). Altruism, A` movement and object agreement in Innu-aimén. Linguist. Inq. 33, 385-407.
doi: 10.1162/002438902760168545 in formal agreement, or able to work together easily complete agreement between all members of a group legally written between two people or companies that says what each does for the other or give to the other Mancini, S., Postiglione, F., Laudanna, A., Rice and Rizzi, L.