The Kingdom of Uganda is subject to the same customs rules, Porter Regulations, etc., which can be introduced with Her Majesty`s agreement for the Ugandan protectorate in general, which can be described as external taxation in one sense, but no other internal taxation, with the exception of the shelter tax, is imposed on the indigenous peoples of Uganda province without kabaka`s agreement. which is guided in this case by the majority of votes on its original council. The presentation of this topic shows that the signing of the Buganda Agreement has led to changes in Uganda`s policy and social lifestyle. The signing of the Buganda agreement undermined Kabaka forces when Kabakaship`s functions were swept away: he lost his say to Bugandas Landdingen. He could no longer appoint leaders without the protectorate administration agreeing and other ideas that your territory administration was centered were swept away. In areas such as Busoga, Kigezi and Ankole, existing political structures have been remixed and traditional leaders have all been placed among western district officials. These actions raised a question among today`s free writers: „Did the flag follow the mix?“ In 1935, Sir Philip Mitchell arrived in Uganda as governor after serving in Tanganjika for the past sixteen years. He was convinced that the relationship between Uganda and the protective power should have a different character than that of the local authorities and the Tanganjika government. [9] Recognizing that the early protectorate had produced a pattern of growing distrust and clandestine change, Mitchell devised a plan to reform and restructure the system between the protectorate government and the Buganda government. [10] In asserting that the relationship between the protectorate government and the government of Buganda`s mother was that of protected and non-indirect domination, he planned to replace the post of provincial commissioner of Buganda with a resident and to remove district officials from the centre, provided that Kabaka was required to follow the advice of the resident and his collaborators.

[9] However, under the Ugandan Convention of 1900, Kabaka was only required to respond to such advice in the case of the implementation of the Lukiiko resolutions. Relations between Kabaka, the protectorate government and its ministers deteriorated and, due to the limited power of the governor under the 1900 agreement to impose its council on Kabaka, the reorganization led to a steady decline in the influence that the protectorate government could exert in Buganda. [9] In establishing Uganda`s northern border as the Kafu River, the 1894 Colvile Agreement formalized the promise that Uganda would obtain certain areas in exchange for their support against Bunyoro. [1] Two of the „lost counties“ (Buyaga and Bugangaizi) were returned to Bunyoro after the referendum on lost counties in Uganda in 1964. [7] The agreement was negotiated by Alfred Tucker, Bishop of Uganda,[5] and signed among others by Mr. Katikiro Apollo Kagwa, on behalf of Kabaka (Daudi Cwa II), then a young child, and Sir Harry Johnston on behalf of the British colonial government. The Kabaka turbulence of 1953 was another factor responsible for the political change in Buganda. Kabaka`s problems were attributed to disagreements between Sir Andrew Cohen and Kabaka Muteesa ll and led to Kabaka`s exile in the United Kingdom because it was unable to verify the terms of the Buganda Treaty of 1900.

The crisis gave Lukiiko absolute authority to propose who the Kabaka ministers would be, which is why Kabaka should be responsible to Lukiiko and not to the British federal government, as it did under the Buganda Treaty.

  Posted in: Allgemein